Professor Peter Littlejohns Emeritus staff Emeritus Professor of Public Health Contact details peter.littlejohns@kcl.ac.uk +44 (0) 20 7848 6814
How reforms hamper priority-setting in health care: an interview study with local decision-makers in London The complexities of integrating evidence-based preventative health into England's NHS: Lessons from PrEP What interventions should we implement in England's mental health services? The mental health implementation network (MHIN) mixed-methods approach to rapid prioritisation Lessons from the demise of Public Health England: Where next for UK public health? What interventions should we implement in England’s mental health services? The Mental health Implementation Network (MHIN) mixed-methods approach to rapid prioritisation. Reforming the public health system in England Respiratory tract infection-related healthcare utilisation in children with Down’s syndrome Affordability and Non-Perfectionism in Moral Action Patient and public involvement in priority-setting decisions in England's Transforming NHS: An interview study with Clinical Commissioning Groups in South London sustainability transformation partnerships National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, social values and healthcare priority setting What are the requirements for developing a successful national registry of auditory implants? A qualitative study Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens’ juries Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): The inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis Information will be the key to successful implementation Shining a light on "hidden patients" Developing guidelines is expensive Recommendations from Two Citizens’ Juries on the Surgical Management of Obesity Correction to: Recommendations from Two Citizens’ Juries on the Surgical Management of Obesity The importance of population differences: Influence of individual characteristics on the Australian public's preferences for emergency care Why was a judicial review required to allow the English National Health Service to commission pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV? Public Health Science 2017 Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: Methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review GRIPP2 reporting checklists: Tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research Universal health coverage, priority setting, and the human right to health Cost effective but unaffordable: An emerging challenge for health systems Levers for addressing medical underuse and overuse: achieving high-value health care Costs and Outcomes of Increasing Access to Bariatric Surgery: Cohort Study and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Electronic Health Records Limited evidence on the management of respiratory tract infections in down's syndrome: A systematic review The NICE alcohol misuse standard – evaluating its impact Engaging the public in healthcare decision-making: Results from a Citizens' Jury on emergency care services Public involvement in health priority setting: future challenges for policy, research and society Public participation in decision-making on the coverage of new antivirals for hepatitis C NHS limiting access to high priced drugs: Drug appraisal issues must be resolved at policy level Accounting for Technical, Ethical, and Political Factors in Priority Setting Setting standards and monitoring quality in the NHS 1999–2013: a classic case of goal conflict Introduction: Priority Setting, Equitable Access and Public Involvement in Health Care Challenges for the new Cancer Drugs Fund What drives junior doctors to use clinical practice guidelines? A national cross-sectional survey of foundation doctors in England & Wales Erratum: What drives junior doctors to use clinical practice guidelines? A national cross-sectional survey of foundation doctors in England & Wales Career choice, professional education and development (BMC Medical Education (2015) 15 (227) DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0557-9) Fildes et al. Respond Prioritising patients for bariatric surgery: Building public preferences from a discrete choice experiment into public policy The importance of being NICE Basing safe staffing levels on evidence Probability of an obese person attaining normal body weight: Cohort study using electronic health records Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision-making of clinical commissioning groups in England Response Response Reducing ineffective practice: Challenges in identifying low-value health care using cochrane systematic reviews The BRICS development bank and health Legal and ethical implications of NICE guidance aimed at optimising organ transplantation after circulatory death View all publications
1 September 2022 Public health reforms in England risk creating a system unfit for purpose Researchers question abrupt abolition of Public Health England and its replacement by the UK Health…