Skip to main content
KBS_Icon_questionmark link-ico

Responsiveness to ADHD treatment may be determined by neuroanatomy

New research from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) at King’s College London has found that that the effectiveness of ADHD medication may be associated with an individual’s neuroanatomy.

ADHD-medication-iStock-1153852500

The research, published in Nature Mental Health, suggests that the development of clinical interventions for ADHD could benefit from identifying how the brain anatomy of treatment-resistant individuals may differ from that of individuals that respond to medication.

Investigators studied individual responses to two-month methylphenidate (MPH) treatment, the prescription medication typically used to treat ADHD, in 60 adults with ADHD. Using MRI, they compared brain anatomy between individuals with ADHD and neurotypical controls, and, among individuals with ADHD, between those that responded and those that did not respond to treatment.

Finally, to better understand their findings, they mapped anatomical group differences onto brain maps of gene expressions.

Researchers found that adults with ADHD who were not responsive to MPH had significant differences in their brain anatomy as compared to both those that responded and controls. These anatomical differences meant that their attention improved less when taking treatment.

Some group differences between individuals with ADHD and controls were associated with differences in the expression of genes related to the transport of noradrenaline, a known target of ADHD medications.

Though MPH is generally effective in improving ADHD symptoms, these findings may help researchers and clinicians understand previous randomised controlled trials which have reported that more than one third of adults do not respond to MPH.

“These findings suggest that those who respond to MPH and those who do not may represent different biological subgroups within the adult ADHD population. This work can help us understand why treatments for ADHD are not universally effective, which will ultimately help to advance the development of more targeted clinical interventions.” – Dr Valeria Parlatini, Associate professor and honorary consultant in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, former Clinical Lecturer at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN).

The study focused only on male individuals, with ADHD more commonly diagnosed in men and following preliminary evidence of sex differences in brain anatomy and biological response to stimulants.

This is one the first studies to investigate differences in neuroanatomy related to treatment response that focused solely on adults with ADHD. Anatomical studies to date comparing responders and non-responders included only children or a mixed sample of children and adults, did not include neurotypical controls for comparison, and have mostly been based on volumetric measures.”– Professor Declan Murphy, Professor of Translational Neurodevelopment, and Director of the Institute of Translational Neurodevelopment, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN).

Researchers note the results need to be replicated and extended in further independent studies to increase understanding of why certain individuals are resistant to treatment.

This would in turn help advance the development of clinical interventions by identifying treatment resistant individuals in the context of clinical trials of new treatments.

This study was possible thanks to funding from Shire and IMI initiatives.

Cortical alterations associated with lower response to methylphenidate in adults with ADHD (https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-024-00228-y) (Parlatini V. MD, PhD, Andrews D.S. PhD, Pretzsch C.M. PhD, Arenella M. PhD, Daly E. PhD, Ecker C. PhD, Murphy D.G. MD, FRCPsych) was published in Nature Mental Health.

For more information, please contact George Fenwick (Senior Communications and Engagement Officer)

In this story

Declan Murphy

Declan Murphy

Professor of Psychiatry and Brain Maturation