What’s next?
In line with existing evidence, I found a ‘life course persistent’ trajectory and ‘adolescent-limited’ trajectories. Moving forward, it would be important to see if we can use different education and social care factors to discriminate between these trajectories. This has the potential to provide deeper insights into how these factors might affect offending patterns. This information could be used to inform criminal justice system responses, given that one group does not offend into adulthood.
My sample contains males and females, but the large number of men has undoubtedly driven my results. There is little consensus about the development of female reoffending patterns over time. Future work on trajectories should utilise female-only samples to ensure they achieve better outcomes in the criminal justice system.
How can administrative data research help?
Recently, the Department for Education (DfE) and MoJ created a large dataset linking together de-identified administrative data on education, social care and crime. The dataset contains lots of important information on every child in mainstream education. It is also cost effective because the data has already been collected.
The recent funding of ADR UK by the Economic and Social Research Council, part of UK Research and Innovation means that it is now possible for researchers like me to use this data. I hope that this will showcase new ways to tackle public health problems and improve public services.
The project described here has the potential to identify previously unknown offending patterns based on ‘real world’ data from the offending population in England and Wales. It may also identify unknown drivers or even preventative factors for offending. Overall, the results of this project will highlight whether administrative data can be used to inform UK offending reduction strategies in a highly efficient and cost-effective way.
Using the linked administrative data described here, we went on to examine childhood educational predictors of the five reoffending trajectories, the results of which can be found in this data insight paper.
Administrative data is a powerful low-cost alternative to expensive and lengthy prospective longitudinal studies. However, using de-identified administrative data for research purposes like this can raise some important ethical and legal questions. That is why I plan to consult with the people affected by this research – such as ex-offenders and young people – during the project. Giving those involved a voice in the research I am undertaking will help shape the project and provide ideas on how to use its results in future.