Fieldwork remains an essential piece of the puzzle. Without it, our ability to monitor and respond to environmental changes would be severely compromised.
Fieldwork is also at the heart of our teaching in the Geography Department at King’s College London. Alongside staff research trips, we also organise field trips for undergraduate students – an invaluable experience that helps bridge the gap between classroom theory and real-world application. In fact, a recent student survey confirmed how crucial these hands-on experiences are to their learning.
However fieldwork for researchers in our Department often means travelling abroad. This might be because the environmental phenomena we study simply don’t occur in the UK – like my colleague’s research on the impact of extreme wildfires on air quality and health, which required travel to a place where such fires are a major threat. Other times, the reason is more practical. Some satellites, for example, cannot see through clouds, so to reliably collect validation data we need to work in areas with clearer skies. Unfortunately for us, the UK isn’t exactly known for its sunshine!
But while travel is essential for much of our research, it also contributes to carbon emissions, particularly through air travel. This presents a difficult paradox: how do we balance the need for fieldwork with our responsibility to the environment? For geographers, this raises an additional question: can we truly study the environment ethically if our research also contributes to its harm?"
King’s College London’s new Sustainable Travel Policy recognises this tension, acknowledging that while some travel is unavoidable, we must rethink when and how we travel. In the Geography department, we’re taking this a step further by developing a Sustainable Fieldwork policy, focusing on ways to reduce emissions from staff research and student field trips. The goal isn’t to eliminate travel entirely, but rather to be more strategic – prioritising essential trips while cutting down on unnecessary ones.
What could this look like in practice? For researchers, it might mean consolidating fieldwork into a single trip rather than making multiple journeys. For student field trips, it could involve choosing locations accessible by train rather than flights. We’re also engaging students in these discussions, ensuring that those who will be most affected by climate change have a voice in shaping more sustainable academic travel.
Our journey towards low-carbon field research is an ongoing process. But by adopting innovative practices, supporting institutional policies, and regularly reflecting on our impact, I believe we can continue to advance our understanding of the planet – while also doing our part to protect it.
If you would like to be part of the conversation around sustainable academic travel, come along to our event Sustainable academic travel: balancing global research with climate responsibility to hear from industry experts at a panel discussion and Q&A.