and contribute to bilateral capacity-building programmes for priority partners overseas. This could include a new awareness campaign to helping the public recognise how the world of social media and ad tech works thus reducing vulnerability to hostile propaganda, disinformation and conspiracy thinking. There are important lessons to learn from the success of the campaign to protect the 2020 US presidential election, run by Chris Krebs heading the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. The UK Department for Education, with the devolved administrations, should be tasked to develop programmes to teach critical thinking and safe online behaviour from an early age in schools.
Strategic Campaign 3 Defend. Lead department Home Office. The Integrated Review proposals to revise existing offences to deal more effectively with the espionage threat and create new offences to criminalise other harmful activity such as covert influence operations conducted by, and on behalf of, foreign states and to introduce a form of UK foreign agent registration scheme will all help defend against subversion. The NCSC should expand their existing active defence cyber initiatives protecting the government domain (.gov.uk) to other sub-domains within (.uk) such as (.ac.uk). The NCSC should work with Cloud providers to promote comparable degrees of protection for their UK users. The existing cross-government Counter-Disinformation Unit should pro-actively ensure very rapid rebuttal of fake news stories that affect UK interests as part of the coordinated effort. BBC World Service, identified in the Integrated Review as a soft power strength, should be funded sufficiently to allow them to continue robust independent broadcasting of the British voice overseas.
Strategic Campaign 4 Deter. Lead department Cabinet Office. The Integrated Review describes the targeted, responsible offensive cyber capability the UK is building through the National Cyber Force. Offensive operations should be conducted when necessary to raise the cost and difficulty to our adversaries of conducting information operations against us, as well as other forms of cyber-attack and espionage, recognising that these tools of coercion and interference can also be used in ‘hybrid’ combination with more traditional hard power methods. Such counter-subversion activity has to be integrated with the Defending Democracy programme already under way. Offensive operations can be led by the National Cyber Force, under the command of Strategic Command in accordance with the Integrated Operating Concept 2025, supported by the Security and Intelligence Agencies. But strategic direction from government will be needed, such as could be provided from an interdepartmental committee of the NSC chaired by the Cabinet Office.
Ethical Principles to Apply to Counter-Subversion Operations
UK information activity will involve vigorously putting over the UK side of any story. There are likely to be direct and indirect audiences for our messaging given the global reach of digital communications.
- The target audiences – those the UK most wishes to reach directly with its messaging.
- The rest of the world, especially in the global South, whose view of the UK and what we stand for vis a vis our competitors will be influenced both by what we say and how we say it and whether we are being seen to exercise our part of responsible stewardship of the digital environment.
- Our domestic publics, whom we need to continue to support our policies and processes and whom we must not inadvertently mislead by our overseas messaging.
Those planning and conducting strategic campaigns along the four lines set out in this paper should operate according to well accepted ethical principles, whether the campaigns involve technical operations in cyberspace, the use of Artificial Intelligence capabilities or the direct conduct of rebuttal and other overt information activity intended to influence target audiences. Oversight arrangements involving the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee and the Investigatory Powers Commissioner can help provide public and international assurance that in respect of covert activity ethical and legal standards are being upheld in accordance with the Integrated Review’s goal of supporting the rules based international order. The work of all four strategic campaigns outlined above on information operations should be drawn on contribute to the wider international discussion of norms of responsible behaviour in cyberspace.
There are six ethical principles derived from the Just War tradition that underpins international humanitarian law that can help identify where ethical questions will have to be addressed and answered:
- Right intention – ensuring that the UK is always acting for defensible motives and with integrity, taking especial care over the effect on domestic audiences of covert information operations that are intended to influence international opinions unattributably
- Proportionality – keeping the ethical risks being run in line with the seriousness of the harms that UK operations are intended to mitigate, with a case-by-case justification that balances the value of the operation against the ethical risks involved.
- Right authority – the greater the ethical risk, the higher the level of command authority that should be required, thus providing proper accountability for decisions, oversight and an audit trail of who agreed to what – essential to defend reputations when operations become the subject of public debate, as they are occasionally bound to these days when secrets tend not to stay secret for very long.
- Discrimination – the ability to assess the potential for offensive activity (and the operation of defensive systems) to cause harm to individuals or property not foreseen or not tackled during development – particularly if defensive operations have to be conducted swiftly and with great agility using machine learning systems to disrupt servers and networks carrying hostile material. Information operations intended to influence directly those involved in conducting hostile operations against us should avoid harm to family members or other innocent individuals.
- A reasonable prospect of success – requiring operational planners to be able to provide a substantiated justification why they think an operation will contribute to achieving the desired authorized effect, in ways that are sufficiently targeted and not indiscriminate. This will require sufficient effort to be devoted to post-operational analysis of the effect of information activity that has been carried out in order to build up an evidence base.
- Finally, necessity – just because the UK can do it does not mean the UK should. The moral obligation rests on those planning and authorizing information operations that carry ethical risk to consider whether there is any reasonable prospect of achieving the authorized end at lesser risk.
Taken together, knowing that activity is being judged against these principles should provide International and domestic reassurance that the UK is exercising its right to defend itself from hostile activity in ways consistent with our values and commitment to the rule of law in accordance with the strategic objective of the Integrated Review that