Skip to main content
KBS_Icon_questionmark link-ico

The Philosophy Of The Vienna Circle

Key information

  • Module code:

    6AAN0B52

  • Level:

    6

  • Semester:

      Autumn

  • Credit value:

    15

Module description

The so-called ‘Vienna Circle’ shaped the idea that philosophy is a science and set the agenda for much 20th century philosophy. Philosophers such as Quine, Putnam and, through them, Lewis are influenced by the Vienna Circle. In the module we will work through some of the pre-history of the Vienna Circle in order to get a grip on the Anti-Metaphysical Stance of the Circle. We will then explore its main positive doctrines.


For full details, please visit our website:
https://www.kcl.ac.uk/artshums/depts/philosophy/modules/level6/6aan0b52.aspx

Assessment details

Summative assessment:1 x 3,000 word essay (100%)

Educational aims & objectives

The Module aims to introduce students into the main tenets of the philosophy of the Vienna Circle/Logical Empiricism.

Learning outcomes

Students will possess knowledge of the main doctrines of logical positivism and be able to evaluate them.

Teaching pattern

One one-hour weekly lecture and one one-hour weekly seminar over ten weeks.

Suggested reading list

Becher, E. 1905. The Philosophical Views of Ernst Mach. The Philosophical Review 14, 535-562.

Blackmore, J.T. 1972. Ernst Mach: His Work, Life and Influence. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Blumenberg, A.E; Feigl, H. 1931. Logical Positivism. The Journal of Philosophy 11, 281-96.

Edgar, S. 2013. The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F.A. Lange and

Becher, E. 1905. The Philosophical Views of Ernst Mach. The Philosophical Review 14, 535-562.

Blackmore, J.T. 1972. Ernst Mach: His Work, Life and Influence. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Blumenberg, A.E; Feigl, H. 1931. Logical Positivism. The Journal of Philosophy 11, 281-96.

Edgar, S. 2013. The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F.A. Lange and 

Becher, E. 1905. The Philosophical Views of Ernst Mach. The Philosophical Review 14, 535-562.

Blackmore, J.T. 1972. Ernst Mach: His Work, Life and Influence. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.

Blumenberg, A.E; Feigl, H. 1931. Logical Positivism. The Journal of Philosophy 11, 281-96.

Edgar, S. 2013. The Limits of Experience and Explanation: F.A. Lange and 

Mach on Things in Themselves. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21, 100-121.

Friedman, M. 1983. Critical Notice M. Schlick Collected Papers. Philosophy of Science 50, 498-513.

¾ 1997. Helmholtz’s Zeichentheorie and Schlick’s Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre: Early Logical Empiricism and Its Nineteenth-Century Background. Philosophical Topics 25, 19-50.

¾2012. Scientific Philosophy from Helmholtz to Carnap and Quine. In Creath, R. (ed.) Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Dordrecht: Springer, 1-11.

Hamilton, A. 1990. Ernst Mach and the Elimination of Subjectivity. Ratio 3, 117-135.

Kraft, V. 1953. The Vienna Circle. The Origin of Neo-Positivism. New York.


Module description disclaimer

King’s College London reviews the modules offered on a regular basis to provide up-to-date, innovative and relevant programmes of study. Therefore, modules offered may change. We suggest you keep an eye on the course finder on our website for updates.

Please note that modules with a practical component will be capped due to educational requirements, which may mean that we cannot guarantee a place to all students who elect to study this module.

Please note that the module descriptions above are related to the current academic year and are subject to change.